> Desmond wrote:
> > Is it possible for the tree view to behave as follows:
> >  
> > When a tree node is collapsed, show the element type as well as the 
> > 1st line of content from under that tree node i.e. content 
> truncated 
> > to fit within a single line in the tree view?
> >  
> > Then instead of seeing a tree with:
> > ul
> >     li
> >     li
> >     li
> >     li
> >  
> > I would see:
> >  
> > ul The states in the U.S.
> >     li Michgan
> >     li Texas
> >     li California
> >     li ...
> >  
> > This would make the tree view a more useful and informative 
> > table-of-content.
> 
> I'll add this to our ever growing user's wish list. See 
> http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/wish_list.html
> 
> But note that
> * we highly recommend to work using the styled view alone,
> * the tree view has not been created in order to be used in 
> conjunction with the styled view.
> 
> Therefore improving the usability of the tree view is a 
> low-priority task for us.

Rather than focus on enhancing the current tree view and as long as
we're dreaming, I'd submit the request as follows:

Provide a "toc view" like XMetaL's "Structure View" or MS Word's
"Document Map". For its view, XMetaL provides a sample macro (that is
unfortunately a little hackish) to show how to switch between one of
several css stylesheets used to style this view. So you could have one
that is a simple toc with collapsable items, one where the toc includes
procedures and figure, one that is procedures only, one that is figures
only, one that is identical to the main view, whatever other view of the
document would help you. You should be able to scroll this view
independently of the main view and edit in either (like a second buffer
in emacs). Double clicking on an item in the toc view would synch up the
two views.

I think this provides substantial usablity benefits to someone working
on a long doc. I understand if it's not a high priority, but I figure as
long as we're adding things to the list, we should be clear about what
would really be helpful.

Thanks,
David

This email message is intended for the addressee(s) only and may contain
confidential information. If you have received this email in error,
please remove all traces of the message from the Internet and reformat
your hard disk.

Reply via email to