Alex Milowski wrote: > In the configuration files, the the 'name' attribute on the top element > is not > specified, it seems as though the configuration is not > loaded/recognized. Shouldn't > this attribute be required?
The "name" attribute is not required because this attribute does not make sense for configuration files (example: common.incl) which are just here to be included inside the master, named, configuration file (example: docbook.xxe).
