Hi all,

Hussein Shafie a ?crit:


>>Thanks. In fact I wonder whether XXE should *natively* support Docbook's
>>processing expectations. I've well understood that XXE is*highly*
>>customizable :-)
> 
> XXE supports whatever you want to make it support if you take the time
> to customize it.

That is *very* clear.

>The bundled configurations are simply a starting point.

OK. So, I understand that I'll have to develop Docbook's "official" 
Processing Expectations myself :-)

> Currently, command editMenu (which displays the Edit popup menu) is not
> contextual. That is, it cannot be parametrized to display a menu which
> depends on the node being clicked upon.

OK.

>>Now, I select the whole sect1 element in order to use the "insert"
>>command to create a sect1info element. Unfortunately, this element is
>>*not* listed because I think that XXE assumes that the content model is
>>valid as it is.
> 
> This content model *is* valid.

Definitely.

> We are not fully satisfied with current semantics of the "insert into"
> command:
> * insert an element at caret position (even if an ancestor of ``caret
> container'' is explicitly selected);
> * OR, only if selected element is empty, add a child to this element.
> 
> We will probably rethink the "insert into" command but not on the short
> term.

OK.

> This being said, we'll fix this minor bug.

Thank you... for this and all the rest.

Cheers,

-- 
Pierrick Brihaye, informaticien
Service r?gional de l'Inventaire
DRAC Bretagne
mailto:pierrick.brihaye at culture.gouv.fr


Reply via email to