Jean Jordaan wrote: > > According to Dave Pawson, it should be OK to have 'info' as a child of > 'book'. XXE doesn't allow it, though. This is with this kind of doc: > > <book version="5.0" xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"; > xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"; > xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"; > xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"; > xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"; > xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; > xmlns:db="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook";> >
The RELAX NG schema allows you to have either * an <info> possibly containing a <title> * OR a <title> followed by an <info> which cannot itself contain a <title>. The problem is that we have found a nasty bug related to the <info> of a <book> (there is no problem with the <info> of a <chapter>, a <section>, etc). Here's an excerpt of the changes.html file of next version of XXE: --- When replacing the title element of a DocBook 5 book, the Edit tool randomly suggested the following pairs of element templates: info(no_title), info(title) and info(no_title), info(no_title). The Edit tool now always suggests info(no_title), info(title). If you need to add meta-info to a DocBook 5 book, please restrict yourself to replacing its title element by an info(title) template. Do not replace the title element by info(no_title) and do not insert info(no_title) after the title element as this would cause XMLmind XML Editor to automatically switch to lenient mode. This limitation is specific to the title and meta-info of a book (because the title element is optional in info(title) which makes the content model truly ambiguous). There is no such problem for the title and meta-info of a chapter or a section. --- For now, you need to replace the bare <title> by an <info> containing a <title> using a text editor.
