Thomas Dumm wrote: > I am not shure, but to me it looks as if the image-viewport-width given > as a percentage of the available space does not work properly. It does > not have any effect in my layout. But I am not shure if I understand the > meaning of the viewport-width correctly. Could you please confirm, that > the behaviour of the key "viewport-width" is correct. Then I know that I > have an error in my layout. >
image-viewport() works as described here: http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/_distrib/doc/csssupport/image-viewport.html May be you forgot to append a "%" after the value passed to the viewport-width parameter or may be you made a mistake in the other properties of the elements you are styling (e.g. improper value of display) or may be you need to use content-width rather than viewport-width. XHTML example: --- img { display: block; content: image-viewport(attribute, src, data-type, anyURI, viewport-width, 50%, viewport-height, 10cm, horizontal-align, right, vertical-align, bottom); } --- See attached screenshot. Note that generally you'll want to specify the percentage from the value of an attribute. It can be done like this: --- viewport-width, xpath("concat(@foo,'%')"), --- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: viewport-width.png Type: image/png Size: 58414 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.xmlmind.com/pipermail/xmleditor-support/attachments/20080814/fbc8c60b/attachment.png
