Thanks for the info. I've created an add-on that essentially just adds the necessary DTD and it works fine for me. The add-on can be found here: http://cern.ch/loomis/XMLEditor/list.xxe_addon. Not much in it, but you're welcome to take it, adapt it, and/or incorporate it if you'd like.
I don't know if I can say that XHTML 1.1 is a "must have". We chose it only because it is the latest recommendation, is strictly defined, and removes all of the deprecated HTML constructs. The actual differences from XHTML strict are minimal. Nonetheless, adding support for XHTML is really trivial (as you can see from the add-on), so it might make sense to include it by default. Thanks again for your help. Cal On Nov 15, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Hussein Shafie wrote: > Charles Loomis wrote: >> I'm evaluating the XMLEditor for editing/maintaining the >> documentation for a couple of projects. The document sources are >> docbook v5 and xhtml 1.1. For docbook the editor works great. >> For xhtml 1.1, the editor brings up the tree view, but there is no >> associated styled view. Is there a way to have the editor >> recognize xhmtl 1.1 and bring up the xhtml styled view, other than >> changing the internal doctype declaration? > > Sure. You need to write a configuration for XHTML 1.1. How to do > this is explained here: http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/_distrib/ > doc/configure/index.html > > Alternatively, if you explain why XHTML 1.1 is a must have, we > could bundle a XHTML 1.1 configuration with XMLmind XML Editor. > > >
