Dear, I'm not sure to understand all the disappointment here
XML Mind has always had a clear supports of Open Source contents That seems fair and justifyed to limits the free of charge licence to a non commercial use I think O'Reilly is here playing a bad game, asking for software companies to help them make benefits Since O'Reilly is already selling books on Open Source projects, and since gaining money from that, I find that really unfair to take that position Every project need supports, and if OReilly had supported XMLMind sooner more clearly in the past, may be some things may be different XML Mind is an excellent product, with a very very excellent support ! I think it is worth 200$ and everybody know that a good authoring tool is difficult to find, and in almost all the case you have to pay more !! Xmlizer On 3/28/07, Hussein Shafie <hussein at xmlmind.com> wrote: > maurizio codogno wrote: > > Hussein, I read the new license, but I am not really sure what it > > means in my case. I use XML Editor to write DocBook documents which > > are left free of charge (both in the final html form and as xml > > source) on my site, with a Creative Commons > > Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 license. Does it qualify as a > > bona fide use under the new license? > > Yes. We'll slightly change the license to make that clear: future > Personal Edition may be used to create and modify Open Source contents > (and not only the documentation of Open Source projects). > > > > -- > XMLmind XML Editor Support List > xmleditor-support at xmlmind.com > http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support >
