Wednesday, June 13, 2007, 11:39:11 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Wednesday, June 13, 2007, 10:12:12 AM, Hussein Shafie wrote: > >> Not a bug. This is the intended behavior. The wrap operation ``filters'' >> wrapping an element into itself (even if this is allowed by the schema) >> because it is generally not useful to do so. > > How am I supposed to create two elements of the same type that are > directly nested into each-other? Never mind, I have found it out. (Create an empty div before the already existing one, and cut-paste the original one into it.) Sorry... >> Note that converting or wrapping *two* <div>s into a single <div> works >> fine. >> >> Daniel Dekany wrote: >>> So, in XHTML if I select a div element, and then I select Edit -> >>> Convert [wrap], then it doesn't lists div as a possible wrapper. Why >>> is that? I believe it's valid according the XHTML DTD. -- Best regards, Daniel Dekany
