I don't know if additional declarations are needed for <xi:include> The verification command is: xmllint --postvalid --xinclude --noout cs60_pro_userguide_book.xml
XXE 4.4.0 rejects the document, highlighting four places: (1) "trademark:registered" because "the sequence of child elements is incorrect," and (2) each XInclude with "element cannot contain element xi:include." Although xmllint does grind away a while running through about 400 files, it does validate, provided that "--xinclude" is specified as-required. It does not object to the order of any child elements, as XXE does. I do not know if XXE's validator consults "/etc/xml/catalog" (et al) to look for DTDs and I have not yet studied the config-file reference to see if anything relevant is in there. I do, however, observe that indeed there seem to be a set of templates for "V4.4" installed with the XXE product (as well as those listed in the catalog, which are fresh and new). The file that is being rejected was made, at one time, by XXE, and has not been manually modified. On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Hussein Shafie<hussein at xmlmind.com> wrote: > sundial wrote: >> I have some (apparently DocBook 4.4) docs, with <!DOCTYPE>s to match. >> XXE made them (in v3), now insists they are "invalid." Doesn't like >> the XIncludes or registered trademarks. Meanwhile, xmllint gives them >> a passing grade. I believe xmllint, but XXE basically won't edit the >> files anymore. What gives, and how do I fix it? >> >> Everything now has a proper DocType declaration. It is V4.4. > > Please send me one of such documents. > > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cs60_pro_userguide_book.xml Type: text/xml Size: 1333 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.xmlmind.com/pipermail/xmleditor-support/attachments/20090724/3e199566/attachment-0001.xml
