"no <!DOCTYPE>, different namespace declarations, etc..." 
So a change from dtd to schema is only an option if one completely changes
from dtd to Schema: all editors, full publication process, full conversion
process, cms. 
This ist absolutely not an option for us.

> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Hussein Shafie [mailto:hussein at xmlmind.com] 
> Gesendet: Montag, 16. November 2009 15:33
> An: Thomas Dumm
> Cc: xmleditor-support at xmlmind.com
> Betreff: Re: [XXE] When does XMLmind write the DCMI namespace URI?
> 
> Thomas Dumm wrote:
> > 
> > Not so good news...I would not say, that we make heavy use 
> of namespaces.
> > Just in the MathML and in the DCMI. 
> 
> Sorry again for this limitation. But please understand that 
> we do not want to invest in DTDs.
> 
> 
> 
> > Your first suggestion (change editor) would put us back to 
> square 1. I 
> > can try the automatic conversion, although I have no idea about 
> > unwanted side effects (dtd-invalid xml-data). So I have 3 questions 
> > (which have little to do with xmlmind):
> > 
> > - What parameters do you recommnd for the "trang dtd input module 
> > 
> (http://www.thaiopensource.com/relaxng/trang-manual.html#dtd-input)"?
> 
> This command line was used to convert the MathML DTD to RELAX 
> NG Compact Syntax.
> 
> java -jar /usr/local/src/trang-20030619/trang.jar \
>         -I dtd \
>         -i xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML \
>         -i xmlns:xlink=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink \
>         -i annotation-prefix=a \
>         -O rnc \
>         presentation-subset.dtd presentation-subset.rnc
> 
> Choosing the right command-line arguments may be tricky (due 
> to use of namespaces in the DTD!)
> 
> 
> 
> > - Will the XML-file still "look like now" (dtd-declaration and to 
> > on...) even if it is checked by the schema
> 
> Yes, in terms of presentation on screen. *No*, in terms of 
> XML save file (no <!DOCTYPE>, different namespace declarations, etc).
> 
> 
> 
> > - Do you recommend XML schema or RELAX NG? 
> > 
> 
> RELAX NG Compact Syntax. However, it's really a matter of 
> personal taste.
> 
> Also note that validation against a W3C XML Schema is 
> slightly faster in XMLmind XML Editor.
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to