Magnus G?fvert wrote:
>   
> Thanks for explaining this. As a new XXE user I have not yet got a clear
> understanding of how all pieces go together.
>>   
>>> How do I configure this?
>>>     
>>
>> I don't know.

I now remember that JEuclid, when used in the context of FOP (even more
when the MathML markup is embedded in the XML file) uses font families
and font sizes based on the ones used by FOP.

In the case of FOP, font families and font sizes are specified in its
XSL-FO input[*].



>
> My reason for asking is that we currently have a docbook toolchain based
> on xslt + fop + JEuclid which produces good screen and print pdf output.
> I got comments that the XXE pdf output does not look as good on screen,
> although print is fine (but different). 

You are the first customer to tell us this. For us, this is an important
feedback. (What's the point of authoring documents in DocBook or DITA,
if one ends up with ugly deliverables?) We would be glad if you could
elaborate on this.




> Apparently our toolchain (which
> uses default fonts) outputs a different math font than the xxe
> toolchain. Anyway, I think we can live with the difference.
> 

Please look at the attached PDF file. The MathML equations have been
authored using XXE+its MathML add-on. The PDF has been created from
within XXE (that's important, because the FOP bundled with XXE is
different from the one downloaded from Apache's site) using FOP
0.95+JEuclid 3.1.8_01.

While we are still far from TeX's quality, we find this result more than
acceptable.


---
[*] XXE can be used to map nicer fonts to FOP's logical fonts
(sans-serif, serif, etc). This is very easy to do. Simply use
"Options|Preferences", "Add-on|FOP" section for that. For example, start
by simply clicking "Use Windows Standard Fonts". May be you should give
a try.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: db5mml_sample.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 155205 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://www.xmlmind.com/pipermail/xmleditor-support/attachments/20091203/925ed0bd/attachment-0001.pdf
 

Reply via email to