On 2011 Mar 28, at 16:13, Trevor John Thompson wrote:

> On 2011 Mar 28, at 10:15, Hussein Shafie wrote:
> 
>> On 03/28/2011 04:57 PM, Trevor John Thompson wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thank you for your prompt response.
>>> I have followed your recommendations, to no effect.
>> 
>> Really strange.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> I notice that the tiny triangle in the upper left corner of the selection 
>>> flashes red.
>> 
>> This means that the caret is inside the text node of the literal
>> element, but the caret cannot be displayed normally because the literal
>> element is hidden.
>> 
>> This would correspond to the following CSS snippet:
>> ---
>> literal {
>>   display: none;
>> }
>> ---
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Might this be a clue?
>> 
>> Not really.
>> 
>> This seems to indicate that docbook.css or any of the CSS stylesheets
>> (e.g. docbook1.imp) it includes is damaged.
>> 
>> Unless you have a weird customization of the DocBook configuration
>> floating around, hidden somewhere (that is, not inside directory
>> $HOME/Library/Application Support/XMLmind/XMLEditor4/), you should
>> perform an fsck on your filesystem. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fsck
>> 
>> However [1] I don't know how this is done on the Mac and [2] I thought
>> that with the modern journaled filesystems, such fsck was no longer needed.
> 
> 
> I have no customization whatsoever, and my filesystem is fine (according to 
> 'Disk Utility').
> The CSS stylesheets look OK to me, but i would like to run them through a 
> verifier.
> Would you know of a tool to do that on local files, rather than URLs and web 
> sites?


I have not been able to verify the css, but cannot imagine how it could have 
changed;
so i began to suspect fonts, and found this:
TidBITS Problem Solving: OpenType PostScript Fonts Troublesome in 10.6.7

Could this be my problem? If so, then only Apple can fix.
--
Trevor John Thompson    net: [email protected]

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

 
--
XMLmind XML Editor Support List
[email protected]
http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support

Reply via email to