L. H. Silli wrote: > > in the the release notes [1], you explain that you have added support > for XHTML 1.1. And you justify it, amongst other things, by saying that > it permits use of the @target attribute. > > But in fact, it does not. :-) Or, it of course depends on what you > mean. The W3C Validatot does not accept the @target attribute for the > DTD that XMLmind uses for its XHTML 1.1. documents.
This is probably a bug in the DTD. If my memory serves me well, the corresponding W3C XML Schema accepts the @target attribute. > But of course, > XHTML 1.1. is module based, so you could create your own DTD, perhaps? In our opinion, our support of XHTML 1.1 * is useful, * is based on the standard W3C modules, * follows the general philosophy of XHTML 1.1, * does not introduce interchange problems with the major Web browsers or the major EPUB readers. For us, this is sufficient to release our support of XHTML 1.1 and to claim that we support XHTML 1.1. > > There is, however - and in that regard - another DTD which is *based* > on XHML 1.1 and which does include the target module and thus permits > the use of @target. Namely: the XHTML+RDFa DTD: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd";> > The above DOCTYPE is not ``sniffed'' by Web browsers. The whole idea behind our support of <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd";> is to allow creating HTML pages with XMLmind XML Editor which trigger a predictable behavior in the major Web browsers. > [1] http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/changes.html#v4.9.1 -- XMLmind XML Editor Support List [email protected] http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support
