I've now duplicated the issue in DITA with conrefs. Other than substituting 
conrefs for xincludes, the workflow is identical.



>________________________________
> From: Jeff Hooker <[email protected]>
>To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 7:22:29 PM
>Subject: Re: [XXE] Document Cache in XXE 5.1.0 behaving inappropriately
> 
>
>Additional details:
>
>
>1. This happens only when using the Bluestream XDocs VDrive. I am not set up 
>to test it with any other virtual filesystem.
>2. Re-opening the outdated file from within XXE usingFile > Open > 
>[filename].xml opens the correct version of the document from the repository.
>
>
>If we could pin down the difference between using CRTL-SHIFT-E to open and 
>Xinclude and File > Open > [filename].xml, we'd have good idea of where the 
>problem resides.
>
>
>Jeff.
>
>
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>> From: Jeff Hooker <[email protected]>
>>To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> 
>>Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 3:14:39 PM
>>Subject: Re: [XXE] Document Cache in XXE 5.1.0 behaving inappropriately
>> 
>>
>>Unfortunately, the issue is not fixed after all.
>>
>>
>>It still persists, even in the native XXE docbook5 plugin, when the following 
>>conditions are met:
>>
>>
>>1. User 1 opens a docbook XML document containing one or more xincludes. The 
>>xinclude content is displayed in the document.
>>2. User 2 opens the content of one of the xincludes on another computer, 
>>edits it, and checks it in.
>>3. User 1 uses CTRL-SHIFT-E to open the xinclude for editing. At that point, 
>>regardless of the document cache setting, XXE will open the outdated 
>>document. It must be emphasized that the *correct* version of the document is 
>>loaded into the computer's local cache, but it is not opened by XXE.
>>4. When the user edits, saves, and closes the document, the outdated version 
>>of the content is saved to the repository.
>>
>>
>>Clearing the XXE cache does not clear the outdated content; restarting XXE 
>>does.
>>
>>
>>Jeff.
>>
>>
>>
>>>________________________________
>>> From: Hussein Shafie <[email protected]>
>>>To: Jeff Hooker <[email protected]> 
>>>Cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> 
>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:17:57 AM
>>>Subject: Re: [XXE] Document Cache in XXE 5.1.0 behaving inappropriately
>>> 
>>>On 03/14/2012 06:03 PM, Jeff Hooker wrote:
>>>> The culprit was our custom Docbook add-on.
>>>> 
>>>> We defined the inclusionScheme and related linkType content in the main
>>>> configuration file for the add-on, but it was also defined in the
>>>> docbook 5 package that our custom add-on included. Removing the
>>>> declarations from our custom add-on removed the problem.
>>>
>>>Thank you for this information.
>>>
>>>However I still don't understand what happened and why redefining 
>>>inclusionScheme and/or linkType in your customization could cause XXE to run 
>>>amok.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
 
--
XMLmind XML Editor Support List
[email protected]
http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support

Reply via email to