Daniel L. Rall wrote: > Is that package only for base test cases? A good layout already exists > today, where a parallel package hierarchy of unit tests exists in a > separate tree on the file system. Intermixing the unit tests in the > same packages as the actual application code allows for testing of > package private and protected members, which is key to full coverage for > white-box testing.
I am in the process of rewriting the test suite from scratch for a new branch, which I want to suggest as v3 in the near future. At that point, I'll publish an overview, what has changed and what has not. I am quite open for any suggestion. (Most probably, you and other people will want to have changed a *real lot*, the package structure being the least important part. May even be, that it is refused in entirety.) Until then, please allow me to continue without considering these things and have my own style of working. It allows me to get things done really fast. Jochen P.S: I admit, though, that we seem to have different opinions on a "good layout", given the fact, that org.apache.xmlrpc contains a real lot of classes with *very* different topics.
