On 8/8/05, Scott Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, I should ask "why isn't it just using standard JAXP for > parsing and serialization?" It looks like the parser at least can be > overridden by passing in a class name of a SAX1 driver. But I don't > understand why one is bundled or why there's a hash table of a lot of > implementations and explicit class loading, except maybe for > historical reasons. If I sent in a patch to change this, would it be > accepted?
See the (not yet finished) b20050512_streaming branch. Jochen -- What are the first steps on the moon, compared to your child's?
