+1 for me if we know clearly on which area each of us could participate :)
2006/2/2, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > about three months ago, I posted a proposal for the next version of Apache > XML-RPC, the so-called streaming branch. About one month ago, I have > posted a formal RfC to adopt this branch as version 3: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xmlrpc-dev&m=113668809908356&w=2 > > So far I received few responses from XML-RPC users, all of which have > been positive and encouraging. Unfortunately, response by XML-RPC > developers is still missing. > > I do not know the reasons for the lack of interest. Despite the missing > responses, I would now like to take the next step and call for a formal > vote on my proposal: > > - Replace the current TRUNK with the streaming branch. > - Leave the 2.0 branch untouched and use it for further development > of Apache XML-RPC 2. Currently, this should be used for > Apache XML-RPC 2.0.2, 2.0.3, ... (in other words, minor changes). > A new branch would be required for larger changes (aka > 2.1) > - Publish the current streaming branch version as 3.0 alpha 1. > > > Jochen > > > [] Evers, Andrew > [] Goeschl, Siegfried > [] Gomez, Henri > [] Hoegg, Ryan > [] Rall, Daniel > [] Richardson, Leonard > [] Stevens, Jon Scott > [] Wallnoefer, Hannes > [+1] Wiedmann, Jochen > [] Wilson, John > [] Zyl, Jason van > > > > -- > If you obey all the rules you miss all the fun. (Katharine Hepburn) >
