On 2/23/06, Walter Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Specifically, the simple "ws.addHandler(name, someRandomObject)" > mechanism is _very_ handy, and going out to property files is, for my > purposes (rapid prototyping and integration of code in different > languages) vastly less convenient. Therefore, before I have any > interest in workin on the 3.0 branch, you'll have to agree to reinstate > the older option of providing arbitrary Object instances at runtime to a > handler mapping.
There is absolutely no reason, that prevents additional implementations of XmlRpcHandlerMapping. Patches welcome. Jochen -- Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. (Mark Twain)
