Jochen, Sounds like a good idea. I would love to contrib a patch but no time. If somehow I come up with some time, I will create a patch.
Is there any reason that org.apache.xmlrpc.common.TypeFactory specifies NamespaceContextImpl as its second arg instead of javax.xml.namespace.NamespaceContext? Using the later would make the code less dependent on a particular implementation of NamespaceContext. Rob --- Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rob Butler wrote: > > > Just wondering if there is any ETA on a 3.0 final? > > > Even if it's a wild guess, I'd appreciate > something. > > My personal plan is to have some internal > workarounds and cleanups done, > which will hopefully be done til the end of June. At > which point I'd assume > the code to be API stable and call for a vote on > 3.0beta, with additional > four weeks for both 3.0RC1, and 3.0. > > > > Also, would it be possible to add some support for > > additional types? java.util.Set could easily be > > supported with output similar to a java.util.List. > > Thinking about it, I see no reason for not replacing > java.util.List with > java.util.Collection. Wanna propose a patch that > does this? > > > Jochen > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
