Hi all,
I'm hoping to modify my existing xml-rpc interface to use a JMS
transport rather than HTTP. I want the reliable delivery of JMS and am
losing a small percentage of messages using http. Is there a good
reason for me not to attempt to add a JMS transport to apache xml-rpc?
i.e., because maybe everyone just uses Mule to do this, or JMS is not
suitable for xml rpc (despite that people use it for soap), etc. Any
comments appreciated.
- Kevin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
