It would be better, if you'd file a bug report with a suggested patch.
Jochen
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Livnat Peer<lp...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I am working with xmlrpc-client version 3.1.1.
> I have a java client and the server is written in python.
> I want to invoke a remote methods, who's name is without any prefix, on the
> server side.
> The problem is when using the methods "newInstance" they can:
> 1. add the class name as a prefix (if i use the first 2 signatures):
> public interface X{
> public void foo();
> }
>
> foo() invokes--> X.foo()
> 2. add the string i pass in pRemoteName as a prefix (if i used the 3rd
> signature):
> invoking newInstance with pRemoteName="goo" invokes--> "goo.foo()"
> passing pRemoteName="" invokes --> ".foo()"
>
> The fix i need is in the class
> "ClientFactory.java"
> in method
> "public Object newInstance(ClassLoader pClassLoader, final Class pClass,
> final String pRemoteName)"
>
> add a check if the pRemoteName is empty, if this is the case then no need to
> concatenate "." before the method name.
>
> today - String methodName = pRemoteName + "." + pMethod.getName();
>
> a fix - String methodName = pMethod.getName();
> if(pRemoteName.length()>0){
> methodName = pRemoteName + "." + methodName;
> }
>
>
> Is it possible to get this fix into the package?
>
> thank you, Livnat.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Don't trust a government that doesn't trust you.
