That would be fabulous. I recently tried 3a1 and gave up when I wasn't able to find a consistent distribution for the common utils. My evaluation at the time was that the "a" should be larger (i.e., the code really was alpha state and not ready to be used widely). Having dependent jars would make things soooo much better and would help make first impressions depend on the code rather than the packaging.
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Besides, I do believe this problem will be done as soon as we start to deliver dependencies as part of the next binary release.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
