Thanks! That indeed did the trick!
-----Original Message----- From: Jimisola Laursen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 22 augustus 2006 11:42 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: HandlerMapping problem (3.0b1 to 3.0rc1) Please note that I actually haven't had time to test the code below yet because I am still working on the protocol between server and client, but I believe that this is the way to do it. E.g.: public class MyProcessorFactoryFactory extends StatelessProcessorFactoryFactory { private DataSource dataSource; public AgentRPCProcessorFactoryFactory(DataSource dataSource) { super(); this.dataSource = dataSource; } protected Object getRequestProcessor(Class pClass) throws XmlRpcException { Object result = super.getRequestProcessor(pClass); // initialize request processors if (result instanceof MyRPCImpl) // I use a Proxy solution { AgentRPCImpl agentRPCImpl = (AgentRPCImpl) result; agentRPCImpl.init(this.dataSource); } return result; } } Bellekens, P.A.E. wrote: > > Hi Jmisola, > > Thanks for your reply! > But I must say that I still do not completely understand these > constructs. > > If I instantiate my HandlerMapping as follows: > > PropertyHandlerMapping dhm = new PropertyHandlerMapping(); > dhm.addHandler("Box", XMLRpcMethodForwarder.class); > dhm.setRequestProcessorFactoryFactory(new > MyRequestProcessorFactoryFactory()); > > with the factory extension (just like described in the API): > > public class MyRequestProcessorFactoryFactory extends > RequestSpecificProcessorFactoryFactory { > > protected Object getRequestProcessor(Class pClass, XmlRpcRequest > pRequest) { > Object result = null; > System.out.println("test1"); > try { > result = super.getRequestProcessor(pClass, pRequest); > System.out.println(pClass+" - "+pRequest); > } catch (XmlRpcException e) { > // TODO Auto-generated catch block > e.printStackTrace(); > } > // Configure the object here > //... > return result; > } > > What does this help me? > First of all when I compile this code and fire some client requests, the > printout "test1" is never shown while the API doc says: > > "A new instance is created and initialized for any request" > > And secondly, what can I configure here? The "getRequestProcessor" > method returns an object, not much you can do with that... > > Can somebody maybe explain how I can feed the class with a parameter? > > Greetz > p. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jimisola Laursen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: dinsdag 22 augustus 2006 1:23 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: HandlerMapping problem (3.0b1 to 3.0rc1) > > > Hi! > > Have a look at the different RequestProcessorFactory (sub)classes: > > http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/apidocs/org/apache/xmlrpc/server/RequestProc > essorFactoryFactory.html > > Regards, > Jimisola > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/From-DynamicHandlerMapping-to-----%283.0b1-to-3.0r > c1%29-tf2036402.html#a5916882 > Sent from the Apache Xml-RPC - User forum at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/From-DynamicHandlerMapping-to-----%283.0b1-to-3.0r c1%29-tf2036402.html#a5922360 Sent from the Apache Xml-RPC - User forum at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
