Ok, let me see what I can do. Thanks,
Devin On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 15:03, Aleksey Sanin wrote: > The code changes is only one part of the problem. You should also create > new "explanations" page. > If you can do this and send me a complete code and a page (instead of > patches) I would be happy > to insert this as "example 2" and push current numbers: > example 2 -> example 3, > .... > > > Aleksey > > > Devin Heitmueller wrote: > > >I have made a couple of modifications to example 2. Here's my thinking: > > > >Based on what I read in the document on example 2, it was supposed to be > >like example 1, except it was supposed to build the signature section > >dynamically. However, it also changed the transform algorithm from > >enveloped to C14N inclusive. It also introduced the Reference Id. I > >think while these concepts are worthwhile, perhaps they don't belong in > >the second example. > > > >For simplicity's sake, I changed the transform back to enveloped and > >removed the signature Id and URI. This should make it easier for people > >to understand the example when comparing it's functionality to Example > >1. It also eliminates the need for the doctype, which is something you > >may not want to introduce so early in the example set. > > > >I think the original Example 2 is still quite helpful, as it does > >introduce concepts not demonstrated in example 1. I just think that in > >this case, it would be better to focus on the intended differences > >between example 1 and example 2 (to demonstrate the dynamic addition of > >the signature). Logically, I think the new example should be 'example > >2', and the other examples should be pushed up by one (example 2 becomes > >3, 3 becomes 4). > > > >Attached is the patch. Hopefully it will be of help. > > > >Thanks, > > > > > > > > -- Devin Heitmueller Senior Software Engineer Netilla Networks Inc _______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
