might be lost other the time :) The only problem I have is that I don't see attachment :)
Can you resend it, please?
Thanks,
Aleksey
Moultrie, Ferrell (ISSAtlanta) wrote:
Aleksey:
Done. I didn't think the overload was particularly troublesome since
the XPath syntax was clearly different from a node-name but the approach
you suggested is cleaner and without ambiguity. I'm attaching diffs
against 0.0.10 as before plus an additional diff (-b) which is smaller
and removes some (possibly gratuitous) white-space editing I'd done
while implementing the code. Your choice as to which to check-in.
Ferrell
_______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
