Hello, Aleksey Sanin. I'm really sorry, but let me to draw away you ones more...
AS> Next, there is no reason why XML parser should replace AS> <foo /> AS> with AS> <foo></foo> AS> The "<foo/>" is a perfectly valid XML. [...] AS> There is also no reason for XML parser to sort nodes (moreover, AS> the parser that does it is actualy not an XML parser at all :) ). Canonical XML Version 1.0 W3C Recommendation 15 March 2001 http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n 3.3. Start and End Tags Doesn't this section describe such process? Demonstrates: - *Empty element conversion to start-end tag pair* - Normalization of whitespace in start and end tags - Relative order of namespace and attribute axes - *Lexicographic ordering of namespace and attribute axes* - Retention of namespace prefixes from original document - Elimination of superfluous namespace declarations - Addition of default attribute AS> Of course, you can force libxml to write document in any other AS> encoding but this is beyond the limits of the xmlsec library AS> examples. Thank you. Best regards, Slava Kostin _______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
