As it pertains to the example below, can you see any reason why Microsoft did not use xmldsig-filter2 ?
Ed -----Original Message----- From: Edward Shallow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 23, 2003 11:35 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Emailing: EdTestFormNoMSO.zip Aleksey, This attached is a signature which resulted from successive signings over the same XML from within Microsoft's InfoPath Release Candidate (i.e. coming soon). It is confusing in its use of copy and copy-of. Both signatures have enveloped-signature tranforms followed by XSLT tranasforms. The first signature uses 2 templates the 1st of which is a copy whereas the second signature uses a single template within a copy-of and matches on the @Id of the 1st signature. The second signature seems to cover "only" the first ? Is this a valid countersignature ? Secondly but related, how would one create parallel signatures over the same data using XMLSec ? Using 2 successive sign operations ? Assuming one is using a template, what would it look like for the 2nd sign operation ? For this 2nd pass, does the enveloped-signature transform only exclude the signature being applied (i.e. the 2nd) ? If so, what is the best way to exclude the 1st ? Thanks, Ed _______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
