> Another strange fact (telling it just for fun) that the DigestValue hash > in his example was a precise, fine-crafted, robust SHA1 hash of a NULL > string, mainly because of the missing Id. :-) :) :) :)
> By the way, does it make a difference, that it's not a simple signed XML > document but XML SOAP? I think it shouldn't. There is *a little* difference if you want to sign only your document but not the whole SOAP Envelope. In this case, C14N will propagate SOAP namespaces and "pollute" your document. If you don't want this then it is better to use Exclusive C14N instead of the C14N. Aleksey _______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
