It is a problems on both sides. The LibXML2 namespaces are a little
bit tricky and c14n code had a problem with understanding that attribute
namespace is the same as the namespace declaration in the node.

The patches for both libxml2 and xmlsec are attached (the libxml2 patch
fixes the testC14N test utility and does not change the core libxml2
functionality thus it is optional). I did a quick test and it seems
to be working fine but I will not be able to fully test and check in
these patches till next week.

Aleksey


Tomas Sieger wrote:

Hi Aleksey,
do you think this is a problem on xmlSec / libxml2 side? Or am I doing something wrong?
Please, say a word, I'm under a serious time pressure :-).

thanks again,
 Tomas

Tomas Sieger wrote:

Yes, the c14n itself works well.
The problem arises when XPath is introduced:

cat test.xpath
<XPath xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
(//. | //@* | //namespace::*)[ancestor-or-self::SOAP-ENV:Body]
</XPath>

./testC14N --exc-with-comments test.xml test.xpath
<SOAP-ENV:Body xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
<ns0:Ping xmlns:ns0="http://xmlsoap.org/Ping";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:type="ns0:ping">
<ns0:text xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:type="xsd:string">Hello.</ns0:text>
</ns0:Ping>
</SOAP-ENV:Body>

This is the same behaviour (multiple namespace declaration)
I'm experiencing while signing an Id-referenced element and
then applying exclusive c14n onto the referenced element.
Exclusive c14n in this case copies namespaces declarations in
each element using the namespace (in my case the namespace is
used by attributes). Then, digest is computed from the canonicalized
element and the digest value does not match digest computed by
other dsig implementations - they do not declare namespaces
at each element, just at the first one - so the signature can't
be verified.

Any ideas?

Feel free to ask me for any debug outputs / patched sources to
help you easily reproduce the problem.

thanks again
 Tomas


Aleksey Sanin wrote:

Seems to be working fine for me:

D:\tmp\xml>testC14N.exe
Error: wrong number of arguments.
Usage: testC14N.exe <mode> <xml-file> [<xpath-expr>] [<inclusive-ns-list>]
where <mode> is one of following:
--with-comments XML file canonization w comments
--without-comments XML file canonization w/o comments
--exc-with-comments Exclusive XML file canonization w comments
--exc-without-comments Exclusive XML file canonization w/o comments

$ xmllint --version
xmllint: using libxml version 20608
compiled with: DTDValid FTP HTTP HTML C14N Catalog XPath XPointer XInclude Unicode Regexps Automata Schemas

$ cat test.xml
<SOAP-ENV:Body
       xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
       <ns0:Ping
           xmlns:ns0="http://xmlsoap.org/Ping";
           xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
           xsi:type="ns0:ping">
           <ns0:text
               xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
               xsi:type="xsd:string">Hello.</ns0:text>
       </ns0:Ping>
</SOAP-ENV:Body>

$ testC14N.exe --exc-with-comments test.xml
<SOAP-ENV:Body xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
<ns0:Ping xmlns:ns0="http://xmlsoap.org/Ping"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.or
g/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="ns0:ping">
<ns0:text xsi:type="xsd:string">Hello.</ns0:text>
</ns0:Ping>
</SOAP-ENV:Body>


Aleksey

Tomas Sieger wrote:

Hello,
 I'm experiencing a problem executing an exclusive XML
canonicalization. The canonicalization declares the same
namespace for two times at two elements in parent-child
relation. Consider the following example:




_______________________________________________
xmlsec mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec


Attachment: c14n-namespaces.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip



Reply via email to