In theory, both xmlsec and phaos implement the same W3C xmldsig, c14n, ... specs. And (in theory) there should be no problems like this because all implementations should do the same thing.
However, in reality the specs are really complex and sometimes problems like this show up. Unfortunately, for debugging this particular problem one needs to have both implementations and I can not help you much because I don't have Phaos code. If it would be found that xmlsec is doing wrong thing (according to W3C specs) then I would be more than happy to fix it in xmlsec.
Best, Aleksey
Highdone Trias wrote:
That's fine.
I am not sure, but maybe this question will be dependant on the signed document that I gave to you...
Is there any way I can tweak XMLSec to match Phaos's standards, in signing and verifying the xml document?
Thanks in advanced.
Highdone Trias Advent Resources, Inc. www.adventresources.com 310.241.1500x2214
---------- Original Message ----------- From: Rich Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Highdone Trias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Aleksey Sanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:53:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [xmlsec] X509, verification of signature
Any status on the signed document that I sent to you?
Sorry no. Maybe mid-next-week.
-- Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
------- End of Original Message -------
_______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [email protected] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
