Yes I hear you. It would be irrefutable if we could reproduce it with a native "C" setup.
However, we need one that makes multiple calls (signs, verifies, encrypts, decrypts) per process before exiting. The command line starts a new process for each operation and one cannot measure the memory profile. I guess you were suggesting altering it ? Ed --- Aleksey Sanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This seems to strongly implicated xmlsec-mscrypto. Do you not > agree > > ? > > Yes, this is a very good indication. Can you describe what are > you doing? If you can reproduce it with a command line for xmlsec > command line tool then it is even better! > > Aleksey > > > _______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [email protected] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
