|
I'll be trying .Net Framework-based inter-op in the coming
months, I'll let you know. I remember reporting problems with Beta Releases of
InfoPath 2003 back in 2002 that had to do with faulty canonicalization in MSXML.
This was fixed by the time InfoPath 2003 shipped. They are pretty conscious of
inter-op and do extensive testing with IBM and others. I know for a fact that
they are aware of, and "probably" have conducted inter-op with XMLSec.
Additionally Open Office uses XMLSec and that is definitely on their
radar.
Ed From: Jon Lind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 2, 2006 5:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [xmlsec] .NET Integration Interesting. So
MS to XmlSec works. Has anyone done the
reverse (signing with XmlSec and verifying with
.NET?) From: Ed
Shallow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi
All, I have
verified signed documents from MS Office Word 2007 Beta 2, Office InfoPath 2003,
and Office InfoPath 2007 Beta 2. However I am not sure what crypto lib they use
under the covers. I had heard that they were based on MSXML5 which was not
released to the public and used only internally. I would suspect however that
MSXML5 and the System.Cryptography.Xml .Net packages are compatible, and
therefore by extension so is XMLSec. Cheers, Ed P.S. Office 2007 Beta 2
is publicly available for download are all versions of the .Net
packages From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Lind Howdy. I am wondering if
anyone has successfully used XmlSec to sign a document and then verified it in
Microsoft .NET 2.0? I have Googled this and can’t find any accounts of
someone doing this. Thanks! |
_______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [email protected] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
