I'm not sure I understand. What do you mean by "signed" cert and certificate
subject?
> Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:16:17 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [xmlsec] X509 - does cert need to be included in XML?
>
> You can refer to "signed" cert using certificate subject, etc.
> But some reference MUST present.
>
> Aleksey
>
> Mark Young wrote:
> > I've been verifying signed XML documents using an X509 chain, and I've
> > found that the verification is only successful if the actual signing
> > certificate is provided in the XML. The other certificates in the chain
> > can just be placed in the keys manager. Is there a way for the
> > verification to succeed with all the certificates in the keys manager,
> > without requiring any to be included in the signed XML document? Mike
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > When your life is on the go—take your life with you. Try Windows Mobile®
> > today <http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/115298558/direct/01/>
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > xmlsec mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
_________________________________________________________________
Color coding for safety: Windows Live Hotmail alerts you to suspicious email.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_safety_112008
_______________________________________________
xmlsec mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
