Not at the moment. But I gladly accept patches :) Aleksey
Kai Hendry wrote:
Hi Aleksey, I'm using xmlsec1 1.2.9 (openssl) from Debian. Is Canonical XML 1.1 supported by xmlsec1? http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xml-c14n11-20070621/ Kind regards, ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kai Hendry <[email protected]> Date: 2009/6/8 Subject: xmlsec1 still maintained? To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Hi there Aleksey, hen...@x61 tmp$ xmlsec1 sign --pkcs12 /tmp/xmlsec1-1.2.9/tests/keys/dsakey.p12 --pwd secret --output /tmp/my.sig works.xml hen...@x61 tmp$ xmlsec1 sign --pkcs12 /tmp/xmlsec1-1.2.9/tests/keys/dsakey.p12 --pwd secret --output /tmp/my.sig notworking.xml func=xmlSecKeysMngrGetKey:file=keys.c:line=1364:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecKeysMngrFindKey:error=1:xmlsec library function failed: func=xmlSecDSigCtxProcessKeyInfoNode:file=xmldsig.c:line=871:obj=unknown:subj=unknown:error=45:key is not found: func=xmlSecDSigCtxProcessSignatureNode:file=xmldsig.c:line=565:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecDSigCtxProcessKeyInfoNode:error=1:xmlsec library function failed: func=xmlSecDSigCtxSign:file=xmldsig.c:line=303:obj=unknown:subj=xmlSecDSigCtxSigantureProcessNode:error=1:xmlsec library function failed: Error: signature failed Error: failed to sign file "notworking.xml" hen...@x61 tmp$ I don't understand what's the problem here. Does xmlsec1 not support "http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#rsa-sha256"; ? Kind regards, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [email protected] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
_______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [email protected] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
