Actually, I did a little more research and figured out how to
specify CSP from pkcs12 file. I've updated tests and everything
looks good now.
Aleksey
On 4/24/2010 3:04 PM, Aleksey Sanin wrote:
Thanks for the reminder! I've actually had it sitting on
a branch for a while. Unfortunately, I was able to get
the verification part supported but I can't figure out
how to force CryptAcquireCertificatePrivateKey() to use
the new "Microsoft Enhanced RSA and AES Cryptographic
Provider" instead of the default one. Because of that
signatures from pkcs12 files are broken. I was planning
to take a look but never got back to it.
Anyway, I decided to check it in - I cleaned up a lot of
stuff with this patch and added ability to search for any
number of providers. Roumen, I know you've looked at the
original patch and I would appreciate if you can take a look:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/xmlsec/commit/?id=6ca808b68ab4a0acc1e2c3ec9ad707720cc8c56d
I would appreciate your comments.
Aleksey
On 4/23/2010 11:48 PM, Jirka Kosek wrote:
Hi folks,
what's the status of the following patch:
http://www.aleksey.com/pipermail/xmlsec/2010/008807.html
Were issues resolved and patch accepted? I'm asking because in Europe
legislation in many requires to use SHA-2 based digesting and digital
signature algorithms starting from 2010/2011. xmlsec is now extensively
used on Windows platform in cases when .NET/Java crypto libraries can't
be used for some reason.
Thanks for info,
Jirka
_______________________________________________
xmlsec mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
_______________________________________________
xmlsec mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
_______________________________________________
xmlsec mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
