Yes, I have. XMLSEC file_: ..\src\list.c line: 184 func: xmlSecPtrListCopy, errorObject: , errorSubject: dst->id == src->id, reason: 100, msg: XMLSEC file_: ..\src\xmldsig.c line: 1335 func: xmlSecDSigReferenceCtxInitialize, errorObject: , errorSubject: xmlSecPtrListCopy, reason: 1, msg: XMLSEC file_: ..\src\xmldsig.c line: 1269 func: xmlSecDSigReferenceCtxCreate, errorObject: , errorSubject: xmlSecDSigReferenceCtxInitialize, reason: 1, msg: XMLSEC file_: ..\src\xmldsig.c line: 781 func: xmlSecDSigCtxProcessSignedInfoNode, errorObject: , errorSubject: xmlSecDSigReferenceCtxCreate, reason: 1, msg: XMLSEC file_: ..\src\xmldsig.c line: 547 func: xmlSecDSigCtxProcessSignatureNode, errorObject: , errorSubject: xmlSecDSigCtxProcessSignedInfoNode, reason: 1, msg: XMLSEC file_: ..\src\xmldsig.c line: 303 func: xmlSecDSigCtxSign, errorObject: , errorSubject: xmlSecDSigCtxSigantureProcessNode, reason: 1, msg:
2010/11/17 Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> > What is the stack trace? > > Aleksey > > > On 11/17/10 12:01 PM, Flávio Costa wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I developed my Delphi application using DLLs downloaded from >> ftp://ftp.zlatkovic.com/libxml/ and everything was fine on my tests >> using my company A1 certificate. >> >> When deploying to my first customer, his signed XML contained 4 distinct >> X509Certificate tags. After inspecting my code, I found that this >> strange error was created by libxmlsec, and some google search lead me >> to version 1.2.16, which contains a fix for this problem. But zlatkovic >> only provides binaries for version 1.2.13, so I tried to compile myself. >> >> The following was compiled successfully with MS Visual Studio 2010: >> zlib-1.2.5 >> xmlsec-1.2.16 >> libxml2-2.7.8 >> libxslt-1.1.25 >> >> Using new compiled DLLs, my Delphi code reached the following assert on >> list.c line 184: >> >> xmlSecAssert2(dst->id == src->id, -1); >> >> I've tried to compile libxmlsec version 1.2.13 again, but my code only >> works with zlatkovic's binaries. Every version (1.2.13, 1.2.14, 1.2.15) >> has this same assertion. >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> xmlsec mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec >> >
_______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [email protected] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
