On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 04:40:37PM +0000, Floodeenjr, Thomas wrote: > Aleksey, > > We are having problems with libxml2 that are not related to xmlsec. > Our xmlsec tests are working fine so far, but some of our core libxml2 > usage is broken.
That's the wrong place to report such problems. 2.6.x releases are rather old and 2.6.12 is very old. I fixed a number of things in libxml2 since then. If you got troubles, it may be due to a misuse of the library, compilation problems, or possibly a bug but it's impossible to tell from your report, and this list ain't the right place for it: http://xmlsoft.org/bugs.html In my experience as libxml2 maintainer most of the time when people report "bugs" appareing in recent libxml2 versions it is that they relied upon broken behaviour usually not conformant to the specification. Hiding the problem around by keeping an obsolete version of the library rather than investigating the problem exposes the user to risk including security ones. If you are embbeding libxml2 for any shipping product I urge you to actually report the problem and get it solved instead of hiding this under the carpet by using an obsolete libxml2 version, thanks in advance, Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ _______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [email protected] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
