Cynthia

As far as I know the PAG has not reached any recommendation or conclusion yet. 
Once a conclusion is reached it should be made public.

That said, I think you are referring to RFC 6090 which we reference from XML 
Signature 1.1. This RFC says in section 7.2 "KT-I is mathematically and 
functionally equivalent to ECDSA".

Are you asking whether this statement requires verification through interop 
testing? If so, that is probably a question for the RFC authors, but if the 
specifications are mathematically equivalent I'm not sure why it would be 
necessary.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia

[1] ECC-ALGS, http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6090.txt

On Apr 26, 2012, at 2:33 PM, ext Martin, Cynthia E. wrote:

> Has any interoperability test been performed between ESDSA and KT-I.  it 
> would more clearly demonstrate the recommendations from the PAG.
> 
> Regards, Cynthia Martin/MITRE
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:16 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: XML Signature 1.1 and XML Encryption 1.1 interop testing
> 
> The W3C XML Security working group is working to complete interop testing on 
> XML Signature 1.1 and XML Encryption 1.1 [1].
> 
> Draft summaries of the current interop testing status, including testing that 
> remains to be completed,  are available:
> 
> Draft XML Signature 1.1 Interop Test Report:  
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core1-interop/Overview.src.html
> 
> Draft XML Encryption 1.1 Interop Test Report: 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core1-interop/Overview.src.html
> 
> If you are interested in participating in interop testing please let us know.
> 
> There is also a stable set of XML Security 2.0 specifications, see 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/wiki/PublicationStatus#20
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Chair XML Security WG
> 
> [1]  http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/wiki/PublicationStatus
> 
> For tracker, ACTION-865

_______________________________________________
xmlsec mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec

Reply via email to