Yeah, you need to first build the ate all. Can you just apply the diff on top of the 1.2.9?
-- Aleksey On Jun 3, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Alexwell Sandro <[email protected]> wrote: > I compiled the version xmlsec1-1.2.19 with "no problem". > > But this <fix memory leak in converting cert subject>, I can not compile. > > Result: > base64.c > ..\include\xmlsec/xmlsec.h(20) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: > 'xmlsec/version.h': No such file or directory bn.c > ..\include\xmlsec/xmlsec.h(20) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: > 'xmlsec/version.h': No such file or directory buffer.c > ... > > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Alexwell Sandro <[email protected]> wrote: >> Of course, thanks! >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Good catch. I think I found it >>> >>> https://git.gnome.org/browse/xmlsec/commit/?id=46896def4dfe16b16131869b03db000314413e25 >>> >>> Can you try it? I don't have windows env these days. >>> >>> Aleksey >>> >>> On 6/3/13 7:00 AM, Alexwell Sandro wrote: >>> > I found memory leak with xmlSecTmplX509DataAddSubjectName function. >>> > >>> > I used example from: Signing a dynamicaly created template. sign2.c. >>> > >>> > <http://www.aleksey.com/xmlsec/api/xmlsec-examples-sign-dynamimc-template.html> >>> > >>> > *To generate template:* >>> > (...) >>> > xmlNodePtr keyInfoNode = xmlSecTmplSignatureEnsureKeyInfo(signNode, NULL); >>> > xmlNodePtr x509DataNode = xmlSecTmplKeyInfoAddX509Data(keyInfoNode); >>> > xmlSecTmplX509DataAddSubjectName(x509DataNode); >>> > xmlSecTmplX509DataAddCertificate(x509DataNode); >>> > (...) >>> > >>> > *Result:* >>> > (...) >>> > <ds:KeyInfo> >>> > <ds:X509Data> >>> > <ds:X509SubjectName/> >>> > <ds:X509Certificate/> >>> > </ds:X509Data> >>> > </ds:KeyInfo> >>> > (...) >>> > >>> > *When sign the template occurs memory leak.* >>> > >>> > Data: >>> > 43 00 4E 00 3D 00 41 00 4C 00 45 00 58 00 20 00 >>> > C.N.=.A. L.E.X... >>> > ... >>> > >>> > *When I remove "xmlSecTmplX509DataAddSubjectName"* >>> > xmlNodePtr keyInfoNode = xmlSecTmplSignatureEnsureKeyInfo(signNode, NULL); >>> > xmlNodePtr x509DataNode = xmlSecTmplKeyInfoAddX509Data(keyInfoNode); >>> > /// xmlSecTmplX509DataAddSubjectName(x509DataNode);/ >>> > xmlSecTmplX509DataAddCertificate(x509DataNode); >>> > >>> > No memory leak detected! >>> > >>> > *The same problem when verify the signature.* >>> > With <ds:X509SubjectName> Two Memory Leaks. >>> > >>> > Data: >>> > 43 4E 3D 41 4C 45 58 20 53 41 4E 44 52 4F 20 44 CN=ALEX. >>> > S >>> > ... >>> > >>> > Data: >>> > 43 4E 3D 41 4C 45 58 20 53 41 4E 44 52 4F 20 44 CN=ALEX. >>> > S >>> > ... >>> > >>> > *Without <ds:X509SubjectName> No Memory Leak.* >>> > >>> > *Another detail, when I use:* >>> > xmlNodePtr keyInfoNode = xmlSecTmplSignatureEnsureKeyInfo(signNode, NULL); >>> > xmlNodePtr x509DataNode = xmlSecTmplKeyInfoAddX509Data(keyInfoNode); >>> > >>> > *result:* >>> > <KeyInfo> >>> > <X509Data> >>> > <X509Certificate>MIIE3zCCA8e... >>> > >>> > *When I use:* >>> > xmlNodePtr keyInfoNode = xmlSecTmplSignatureEnsureKeyInfo(signNode, NULL); >>> > xmlNodePtr x509DataNode = xmlSecTmplKeyInfoAddX509Data(keyInfoNode); >>> > xmlSecTmplX509DataAddCertificate(x509DataNode); >>> > >>> > *result with breakline:* >>> > <KeyInfo> >>> > <X509Data> >>> > >>> > <X509Certificate>MIIE3zCCA8e... >>> > >>> > *When I use:* >>> > xmlNodePtr x509DataNode = xmlSecTmplKeyInfoAddX509Data(keyInfoNode); >>> > xmlSecTmplX509DataAddSubjectName(x509DataNode); >>> > >>> > *result with breakline:* >>> > <X509Data> >>> > >>> > <X509SubjectName>CN=ALEX... >>> > >>> > *How to fix the memory leak?* >>> > >>> > tags: windows 7 64 bits, visual studio 2010. > > _______________________________________________ > xmlsec mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
_______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [email protected] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
