Can I have access to that discussion? I cannot find... http://www.aleksey.com/pipermail/xmlsec/
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> wrote: > There was a discussion about this a few months ago in this mailing list. > Basically, xmlsec *does not* allow enveloping signatures for another > xml file. > > Aleksey > > On 6/7/13 4:18 PM, Alexwell Sandro wrote: > > I do not know if this is the list for this question. > > > > I am try to learn about enveloping signature. > > > > If I sign another xml file, what can happen? > > I cannot find examples. > > > > *For this file:* > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> > > <newdoc> > > <content>hi</content> > > </newdoc> > > > > *First case "using xmlAddChild":* > > ... > > *<ds:Object Id="obj-1236">*<newdoc> > > <content>hi</content> > > </newdoc>*</ds:Object>* > > *</ds:Signature>* > > > > - The enconding declaration disappears... > > - Possible namespace conflit (without prefix) > > > > *Second case "using xmlNodeSetContent":* > > ... > > *<ds:Object Id="obj-1236">*/<?xml version="1.0" > > encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
/ > > /<newdoc>
/ > > / <content>hi</content>
/ > > /</newdoc>/*</ds:Object>* > > *</ds:Signature>* > > > > Exists another way? What pros and cons? > > > > Can you recommend Articles. > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > xmlsec mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec > > >
_______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [email protected] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
