I was noticing that exclusive canonicalization seems to differ between the lxml 
and xmlsec implementations. In my observations, if I exclusive c14n an entire 
xml document utilizing the lxml, namespaces that are unused are completely 
dropped. With xmlsec, if I do the same, they remain. 

By unused, I'm meaning a namespace with prefix that has no matching prefixed 
tags in children tags.

Is this deliberate behavior? If so, why the difference?

-Alex
_______________________________________________
xmlsec mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec

Reply via email to