On 11/18/21, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-11-17, Amarendra Godbole via Xmlunit-general wrote:I wanted to highlight that the signature on xmlunit-1.3.jar is bad and won't verify with the key. However, it verifies fine on the associated .pom file.Thank you. I can confirm the signature is reported as bad. The non-crypto checksums seem to be fine, but that's no guarantee things haven't been tampered with. Unfortuantely I haven't got any archive of the release I created more than twelve years ago so I cannot faithfully say whether the file is the one I created and something went wrong with the signature back then or the file really is bad. I'll ask Sonatype for advice.
Let me know what you find out from Sonatype.
At least the signature for xmlunit-1.6.jar seems to be fine as well as some of the 2.x releases I've checked seem to be fine. Stefan
[...] Thanks for the confirmation, we have upgraded to 1.6, and signatures check out fine. -ag --This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and destroy any printed copy of it.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Xmlunit-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlunit-general
