On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:50:27PM -0600, Robert C. Noland III wrote: > On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 10:42 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > > Peter asked on IRC whether I wanted the "HAL startup patch" in 1.6. If > > it's this one: > > > > config: if we can't connect to HAL, listen for a startup notification. > > > > If HAL isn't available when we try to connect, the registered > > NameOwnerChanged > > signal handler waits until HAL is available. Once we connected to HAL, > > we > > unregister the signal handler again. > > This allows HAL to be started in parallel or after the server has > > started. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> > > > > then I think the answer is yes. Can I get someone to take a look at this > > and see whether there are any concerns about this patch? > > I've already applied this to FreeBSD' 1.5.3 release with no negative > impacts, only goodness. It is running in the wild already, so I would > like to see it in 1.6 so I can drop the patch.
we have it in Fedora Rawhide, no negative (or positive) feedback yet, so presumably it at least doesn't wreck ppl's machines. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
