Sorry to spam the list about an individual bug, but this is an important issue for Sugar, and I don't know how else to get a response. Again, I'll try to apply the old patch, if I can get some response that it would be integrated into a new version. But this is not so important that we'd be willing to carry the patch in Sugar, or fork Xephyr. So I wanted to check first, because if nobody will check it in, I'd rather save the time.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jameson Quinn <[email protected]> Date: Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:10 AM Subject: xephyr bug 19365 To: [email protected] You're the asignee for bug 19365 : http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19365. I realize that you probably have many bugs like that auto-assigned to you and cannot take an interest in all of them. I was wondering what I could do to help this bug find a real owner. I'm not really into that kind of programming, but if necessary I could see what I can do to apply the patch that Sascha Silbe found to a current version of xephyr. But I don't want to do that if the bug will nevertheless languish. Thanks, and sorry to bother you, Jameson
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
