Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Looks mostly good to me - one concern though:
>> + XkbRMLVOSet rmlvo_dflts = { NULL };
>
> Won't that just initialize the first field to NULL and leave the rest set to
> whatever was on the stack?
Never mind, while I could swear that unspecified members were undefined,
apparently ANSI C89 specifies that if you have a struct initializer, all
fields not initialized are "initialized implicitly the same as objects
that have static storage duration" (i.e. zero/NULL filled).
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
