On Sun, 03 May 2009 21:48:19 -0300 Tiago Vignatti <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Jesse Barnes escreveu: > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:33:08 -0300 > > Tiago Vignatti <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> This reintroduces secondary cards initialization. > >> > >> We're currently living in a completely mess regarding the resources > >> access control. Some accesses are done by libpciaccess, other by > >> Xorg and other simply don't exist yet (e.g. arbitration of legacy > >> VGA). We can discuss about a beautiful redesign later. In this > >> moment I just want to put back the multiple card, multiple head > >> functionality. The first step is to reintroduce secondary cards > >> initialization. I'll keep the work. > >> > >> PS.: AFAIK the currently implementation of int10's x86emu backend > >> is not working to POST secondary cards (BUG). I POSTed using vm86 > >> instead. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tiago Vignatti <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> hw/xfree86/common/xf86pciBus.c | 33 > >> --------------------------------- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), > > > > Can we create a new define for these and put this code under that? > > Are you saying to put these functions inside the pci library? I'm not > sure if I got you corretly. Can you be more specific, Jesse? That would be one option (probably better). I was actually thinking of making all the #if 0s you removed into #if XF86_RAC or something; we could put all the resource management stuff that shouldn't be necessary with libpciaccess & vga arbitration under that. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
