> If you want to make the names _really_ short, you might consider the
> convention used in the linux kernel and some other places: u8, s8, u16, s16,
> u32.... etc, very short and still readable ;-)
The signed/unsigned fact is probably irrelevant for these macros, as
they are calculating quantities rather than converting pointers. I
would say num_8s_for_64s(words), etc.
--
------
From: Jonathan Morton
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
