On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 02:05 +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 08:27:12AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 14:18 +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote: > > > -m4_ifndef([XORG_MACROS_VERSION], [AC_FATAL([must install xorg-macros 1.2 > > > or later before running autoconf/autogen])]) > > > -XORG_MACROS_VERSION(1.2) > > > AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h) > > > > > > # Check for progs > > > AC_PROG_CC > > > AC_PROG_LIBTOOL > > > -XORG_CWARNFLAGS > > > > > > pciids_path=/usr/share/hwdata > > > AC_ARG_WITH(pciids-path, AC_HELP_STRING([--with-pciids-path=PCIIDS_PATH], > > > @@ -108,9 +104,6 @@ AC_CHECK_MEMBER([struct pci_io.pi_sel.pc_domain], > > > AC_SUBST(PCIACCESS_CFLAGS) > > > AC_SUBST(PCIACCESS_LIBS) > > > > > > -XORG_RELEASE_VERSION > > > -XORG_CHANGELOG > > > - > > > AC_OUTPUT([Makefile > > > src/Makefile > > > pciaccess.pc]) > > > > NAK. > > > > Reducing the functionality of the package for no reason. > > Agreed, but shouldn't XORG_RELEASE_VERSION be removed in general?
Yeah, XORG_RELEASE_VERSION is terrible, and I think XORG_CHANGELOG is pretty bogus, too. Removing the warning cflags is what I don't like. -- Eric Anholt [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
