On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 13:04 +0300, Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote:
> > > My only doubt is regarding the return type on ProcRenderCreateAnimCursor > > > when > > > the server does not support animated cursor. I put as BadImplementation. > > > > Doing so means that the server intentionally has an incomplete/wrong > > implementation of render. Not sure if that's a good idea. > > This seems not to be a big deal. We already have something like this on the > server. See for instance ProcXFixesCreateRegionFromPicture(). Render isn't really optional at this point. > But my concern is another one now - we can save 16KB just removing this > animated cursor code. Yeah, I've been non-verbose about this and you thought > we're treating another issue. Sorry. 16KB of text space? Is that really an issue?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
