2009/9/26 Keith Packard <[email protected]>: > Excerpts from Peter Hutterer's message of Sat Sep 26 08:08:42 -0700 2009:
>> 1. Feature branches: >> 2. Three stages: feature merge - bugfix - release freeze >> I think 3 + 2 + 1 months should be approporiate for the various stages. >> 3. Predictable time-based releases > I like this proposal, one question I have is whether 3 + 2 + 1 is the > right ratio. The kernel does it backwards, with feature merging > happening in a fairly short time followed by the first RC, then a > lengthy amount of testing/fixing before the final release. But, the > kernel also runs a much faster clock and so missing a feature merge > window doesn't cause as much delay before release. The testing rule is 90:90, isn't it? 90% development, then 90% testing. (i.e. you'll spend half your time testing anyway.) - d. _______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
